1. Home
  2. Methodology
Our Methodology · LFL Certified™ v1.0

The score behind the badge.

Every certified firm earns a 0–100 Certification Score from verifiable evidence: licensure and discipline records, court-confirmed outcomes, authenticated client reviews, peer standing — and the quality and authority of its digital presence. No firm can pay for a point. Here is exactly how it works.

Score composition · 100 points
20Verified outcomes
20Client experience
25Digital presence & authority
10Access & responsiveness
Certified from 70Distinguished 85Elite 93
Design principles

Gates before points. Evidence before claims. Local before national.

Gates before points

Licensure, discipline, identity and consumer-protection checks are pass/fail. A suspended partner is not a deduction — it's a zero. Only firms that pass every gate are scored at all.

Evidence before claims

Court records, bar registries and API-sourced reviews outrank anything a firm tells us about itself. Self-reported "$1B recovered" totals score nothing until we can confirm them.

Local before national

Outcomes, review volume and search authority are compared within the firm's state and practice area, so a strong firm in Tulsa is measured against Tulsa, not Manhattan.

Layer 0

Six eligibility gates every firm must pass

Fail one and the firm is listed with a neutral profile but cannot be certified — regardless of reviews, results or website.

G1Active licensureEvery attorney named on the firm's site holds an active license in each state of practice.State bar & court attorney registries (50 states + DC)
G2Clean public disciplineNo disbarment, suspension or public censure of any current attorney in the last 10 years. Older discipline is disclosed on the profile.State disciplinary databases · ABA National Lawyer Regulatory Data Bank
G3Verified entity & officeRegistered legal entity and at least one confirmed physical office — no virtual-office-only listings.Secretary of State · GBP verification · postcard/phone check
G4No consumer-protection actionsNo active state Attorney General, FTC or court sanction for client-related misconduct.AG releases · PACER / CourtListener · news monitoring
G5Honest website baselineLive HTTPS site with working contact and named attorneys; no "guaranteed results", fake badges or misleading claims.Automated crawl + editorial review
G6Minimum footprintAt least 10 public client reviews across verified platforms and one year in operation.Google · Avvo · Yelp · BBB · SoS filing date
Layer 1

Five pillars, 100 points

Each pillar is built from sub-factors with fixed point values. Percentile-based sub-factors are computed within the firm's cohort (state × practice area). Open any pillar for the full scoring table.

Professional Standing

Who the lawyers are and how the profession regards them
25points
Sub-factorPtsHow it's scored
A1 Clean-record depth610+ years clean for all attorneys = 6 · 5–10 years = 4 · private admonition on file = 2
A2 Experience5Weighted average years since admission: 15+ = 5 · 10–15 = 4 · 5–10 = 3 · under 5 = 1
A3 Board certification5State-board or NBTA certification in the primary practice area (e.g., Texas Board of Legal Specialization, Florida Bar Board Certified); partial = 2–3
A4 Peer recognition5Independent, non-paid peer ratings only — Martindale-Hubbell AV, Best Lawyers, Super Lawyers, Chambers. Pay-for-badge "awards" excluded.
A5 Accountability4Malpractice insurance disclosed (2) · membership in substantive bar associations — AAJ, state trial lawyers, NACDL, AILA (2)
B

Verified Outcomes

What the firm has actually achieved, confirmed against records — cohort-relative
20points
Sub-factorPtsHow it's scored
B1 Volume of verified results6Count of confirmed results over 5 years, percentile within cohort
B2 Magnitude / significance6Median verified result vs cohort median. Non-monetary practices (immigration, criminal defense): approval, dismissal or acquittal rates where available
B3 Trial & appellate record5Verdicts taken to trial and published appellate decisions — insurers pay more to firms known to try cases
B4 Recency3Share of verified results from the last 24 months
What counts as verified: court dockets and judgments (PACER via CourtListener, state e-courts), published decisions, jury-verdict reporters, or redacted settlement documentation attested by the attorney under our protocol. Self-reported totals score 0.
C

Client Experience

How clients rate and describe the firm — after authenticity filtering
20points
Sub-factorPtsHow it's scored
C1 Authentic volume5Log-scaled count of reviews across Google, Avvo, Yelp, BBB, Facebook, Lawyers.com — de-duplicated, percentile within cohort
C2 Rating quality6Bayesian average with the cohort mean as prior — so 3 reviews at 5.0 never beat 400 at 4.8
C3 Recency & consistency3Share of reviews in the last 12 months; variance between platforms
C4 Firm responsiveness3Owner-response rate, especially to 3★ and below; tone (non-defensive, no confidentiality breaches)
C5 Complaints3BBB complaints, AG consumer complaints, fee-dispute arbitration records (deductions)
Authenticity filter: reviews are screened for velocity spikes, reviewer-account age, template language and geographic mismatch before scoring. A verified fake-review finding revokes certification for 12 months.
E

Access & Responsiveness

How easy it is to reach and afford the firm
10points
Sub-factorPtsHow it's scored
E1 Free consultation & fee transparency3Free consultation 1 · fee model stated publicly — contingency %, hourly range or flat fee 2
E2 Intake responsiveness3Two anonymous mystery-shop contacts per quarter (web form + phone): under 1 business hour = 3 · under 1 day = 2 · under 3 days = 1 · none = 0
E3 Languages & accessibility2Each language beyond English 0.5 (max 1.5) · ADA-accessible offices or virtual consultations 0.5
E4 Availability224/7 intake line 1 · evening/weekend, hospital or home visits 1
Tiers

What the badge says — and what it takes

Listed
< 70

All gates pass. Neutral profile, no badge, not eligible for ranked lists.

Shows the firm its sub-scores and the path to 70
LFL Certified
70–84

Trustworthy on every dimension we can verify.

A + B + C ≥ 40 of 65
Certified · Distinguished
85–92

Strong verified outcomes and client record, plus a mature digital presence.

A + B + C ≥ 50 of 65
Certified · Elite
93–100top 5%

The top 5% of the firm's state × practice cohort.

A + B + C ≥ 55 of 65 · cohort top 5%
79/ 100
Worked example · illustrative

A New York personal injury firm → LFL Certified

A · Professional standing
21 / 25
B · Verified outcomes
15 / 20
C · Client experience
17 / 20
D · Digital presence
17 / 25
E · Access
9 / 10

A + B + C = 53, so the firm clears the Certified floor. Path to Distinguished (85): add schema markup and bylined content (+4 in D4) and submit two 2025–26 results for verification (+1 in B4). The score breakdown becomes the firm's to-do list.

Reading a scorecard

Every certified profile publishes this exact breakdown

Gates first, then the five pillars with every sub-score and the evidence behind it. Rows are tagged by source — Registry, Observed or, during onboarding, Illustrative — and the card always states the shortest path to the next tier.

See it on a live profile
78/ 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v1.0

LFL Certified

All six eligibility gates passed. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar D (17/25).

LFL Certified 2026 · re-verified Sep 8, 2026
7 points to Distinguished
85 needed · A+B+C floor met (53)
Most headroom: D2 Search authority: +4 available · A3 Board certification: +2 available · B1 Volume of verified results: +2 available
G1 Licensure9 of 9 named attorneys active
G2 DisciplineNo public discipline, 10 yrs
G3 Entity & officeLLP · 7 offices
G4 Consumer actionsNone found
G5 WebsiteHTTPS · honest claims
G6 Footprint400+ reviews
Professional Standing
21/25
A1 Clean-record depthRegistryAll attorneys, no public discipline 10+ yrs6 / 6
A2 ExperienceRegistryWeighted avg admission 15+ yrs5 / 5
A3 Board certificationIllustrativeNBTA civil trial cert., partial3 / 5
A4 Peer recognitionIllustrativeIndependent peer ratings on file4 / 5
A5 AccountabilityIllustrativeBar memberships; malpractice insurance not disclosed3 / 4
BVerified Outcomes
15/20
B1 Volume of verified resultsIllustrative12 verified results · 70th percentile, NY × PI4 / 6
B2 MagnitudeIllustrativeMedian above cohort median5 / 6
B3 Trial & appellateIllustrativeVerdicts on record; no published appellate decisions4 / 5
B4 RecencyIllustrativeOnly 40% of results within 24 months2 / 3
CClient Experience
17/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved400+ Google reviews · As reported by the firm (nyclawfirm.com)5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityIllustrativeBayesian avg 4.8 across platforms5 / 6
C3 Recency & consistencyIllustrativeSteady monthly flow; minor platform variance3 / 3
C4 Firm responsivenessIllustrativeResponds to most ≤3★ reviews2 / 3
C5 ComplaintsIllustrativeOne BBB complaint, resolved2 / 3
DDigital Presence & Authority
17/25
D1 Website trust & experienceIllustrativeCWV pass (illustrative) · no bar numbers on bios · fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content5 / 7
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-07DR 28 → 20th pct of 22-firm cohort (median 34) 1/3 · 906 referring domains, 41th pct 1/2 · 469 organic keywords / 2,736 visits·mo, 38th pct 1/2 · brand demand 1/1 (illustrative)4 / 8
D3 Local presenceIllustrativeGBP complete · NAP consistent · top-3 local pack for 3 of 5 terms4 / 5
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-07content 2/2 · no JSON-LD detected 0/1 · earned media 1/1 (illustrative) · cited in AI answers: 155 citations / 75 pages 1/14 / 5
EAccess & Responsiveness
8/10
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · No fees until we win your injury case3 / 3
E2 Intake responsivenessIllustrativeMystery shop: phone < 1 hr, web form next day2 / 3
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Español · video consults1 / 2
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 case evaluation line · Video consultations · Hospital & home visits · Claim-tracking mobile app2 / 2
Next automated re-check: Oct 1, 2026 · Cohort: New York × Personal Injury (23 firms measured)How the score works →
Re-verification

Certification is a monthly event, not a plaque

Monthly · automated

Re-checked and republished

  • Licensure and disciplinary feeds
  • Review aggregation and authenticity
  • Website crawl and Core Web Vitals
  • GBP, local rankings, authority metrics
  • Scores republish on the 1st business day
Quarterly · human

Tested from the outside

  • Mystery-shop intake calls and forms
  • AI-search visibility sampling
  • Citation and NAP audit
Annually · audited

Documentation reviewed

  • Outcomes evidence re-examined
  • Peer-recognition inputs refreshed
  • Firm re-attests results and insurance
Immediately · revoked

Badge removed within 30 days

  • Any public discipline or suspension
  • AG or FTC action
  • Verified fake reviews (12-month cooling period)
  • Deceptive website claims · loss of office
  • Revocations logged publicly on the profile
Data sources

Where every point comes from

Licensure & disciplineState bar and court registries for 50 states + DC · ABA National Lawyer Regulatory Data Bank
Entity & officeSecretary of State business search · USPS validation · Google Business Profile verification
Court outcomesPACER via CourtListener/RECAP · state e-filing portals · jury-verdict reporters
ReviewsGoogle Places, Yelp Fusion, Avvo, BBB, Facebook — de-duplicated, NLP-scored, authenticity-filtered
Web performance & accessibilityPageSpeed Insights API · Lighthouse · axe-core
Search authorityAhrefs, Semrush, Moz and DataForSEO APIs — cohort percentiles, monthly
Local presenceLocal-pack tracking (5 core queries per firm per market) · citation audits
Content & structured dataCustom crawler: JSON-LD parsing, byline and credential detection, freshness
AI-search visibilitySampled prompts across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews, quarterly
Independence & appeals

No firm can pay for a point

Certification, profiles and score breakdowns are free. Our revenue comes from clearly labeled sponsored placements and optional profile tools — none of which touch gates, sub-scores or tiers.

Can a firm pay to be certified or to rank higher?
No. Certification and the basic profile are free and cannot be purchased. Sponsored units are labeled and never appear inside ranked lists or affect any score.
Can a firm see and dispute its score?
Yes. Every sub-score and its evidence is visible to the firm. Corrections and new documentation can be submitted at any time; formal appeals are reviewed within 30 days by a licensed attorney on our editorial team.
Why include SEO and website signals in a trust score?
Because they are proxies for accountability and real demand. Firms that publish attorney names and bar numbers, state their fees, keep content current and earn links from courts, news outlets and local institutions are easier to verify and harder to fake. Paid ads are excluded, and the pillar is capped so it can never compensate for weak licensure, outcomes or reviews.
How are small-market firms treated fairly?
Percentile-based factors are computed within the firm's cohort — state × practice area, minimum 25 firms — so a regional firm can reach Elite without competing with national brands.
How often does the methodology change?
Changes are versioned and announced 60 days before taking effect; historical scores are preserved. This is version 1.0.
For law firms

See your score before anyone else does

Claim your profile to view your full breakdown, submit results for verification and get a concrete list of what would move you to the next tier.

  • Free — certification cannot be purchased
  • Full sub-score visibility and evidence
  • 30-day appeals reviewed by an attorney
  • Monthly re-scoring as you improve