- Home
- Dallas, TX
- Personal Injury
- Rad Law Firm
Rad Law Firm
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryDallas, TX● Accepting new clients
LFL Verified 2026Measured from public recordsYours to display →
44/100LFL Score, every factor measured
21Points from Certified
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
About Rad Law Firm
Rad Law Firm works from Dallas, publishes a fee statement, a free consultation and home or hospital appointments around the clock, and answers in Spanish.
Its Google listing took a manual check to attach: the firm publishes a login name rather than its own name in its structured data, so a search by that name returned four other Dallas practices. It names no attorney on the pages we could reach.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
551 client reviews
Counted across 1 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
44out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Texas does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
LFL Verified 202621 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (47% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: D2 Search authority: +7 available · B1 Results published: +6 available · B2 Specificity: +5 available
G1 LicensureNot published by TXTexas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by TXTexas does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by TX2 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. We read the Active Franchise Taxpayers (data.texas.gov 9cir-efmm), published as open data by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, which carries the Secretary of State file number, charter date and status and could not identify this firm in it: 1 entity name(s) contain the firm's name and none of them agrees on both the name and the city. A miss there is not evidence that the firm is unregistered, so this gate is unresolved rather than failed. The franchise tax does not reach a sole proprietorship or a general partnership, so this register can confirm an entity and cannot rule one out.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 1 named attorney published.
G6 Footprint551 public client reviews across 2 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2001-09-13, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience18/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved551 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.6 over 551 reviews → Bayesian 4.63 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only4 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-07-24) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority5/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · fee statement · no privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 11 → 5th pct of 19-firm cohort (median 37) 0/3 · 624 referring domains, 26th pct 1/2 · 82 organic keywords / 510 visits·mo, 24th pct 0/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)1 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Dec 1, 2026 · Cohort: Dallas x Personal Injury (20 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
11· 5th percentile
624 ref. domains · cohort median 37 · Ahrefs rank 15.9M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16Trust pages
3 / 3
blog · fee statement · attorney bios
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 54
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-15Practice areas 8 areas · primary focus highlighted
The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 1 more person is named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
Also named by the firm
The firm lists this person among its team and prints no role beside the name, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
4.6
★★★★★
Based on 551 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 2 locations · main office: Dallas
Dallas8001 Lyndon B Johnson Fwy Ste 300, Dallas, TX 75251, USA
Brownsville34 S Coria St, Brownsville, TX 78520, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Rad Law Firm charge?
Rad Law Firm publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Rad Law Firm offer a free consultation?
Yes. Rad Law Firm publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Rad Law Firm have offices?
Rad Law Firm publishes two offices, in Dallas and Brownsville. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Rad Law Firm?
Rad Law Firm names one attorney on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Texas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Rad Law Firm?
Rad Law Firm scores 43 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.
Yours to display
Show this on your site
Rad Law Firm has earned these 3 badges. They are free, they are not for sale, and each one links back to this page so anybody can read the evidence behind it. They are also live: the file is rebuilt every time we re-measure, so a badge on your site says what is true today rather than what was true the day you copied it.
LFL Verified 2026
On a pale background use the light version.
<a href="https://lawfirmlistings.com/firms/rad-law-firm/">
<img src="https://lawfirmlistings.com/badge/rad-law-firm/tier-2026.svg"
alt="LFL Verified 2026" width="310" height="96">
</a>Ranked 6th of 6 · Medical Malpractice · Dallas
On a pale background use the light version.
<a href="https://lawfirmlistings.com/firms/rad-law-firm/">
<img src="https://lawfirmlistings.com/badge/rad-law-firm/medical-malpractice-2026.svg"
alt="Ranked 6th of 6 for Medical Malpractice in Dallas, 2026" width="310" height="96">
</a>Ranked 6th of 6 · Nursing Home Abuse · Dallas
On a pale background use the light version.
<a href="https://lawfirmlistings.com/firms/rad-law-firm/">
<img src="https://lawfirmlistings.com/badge/rad-law-firm/nursing-home-abuse-2026.svg"
alt="Ranked 6th of 6 for Nursing Home Abuse in Dallas, 2026" width="310" height="96">
</a>