- Home
- Chicago, IL
- Personal Injury
- Motorcycle Safety Lawyers
Motorcycle Safety Lawyers
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryChicago, IL● Accepting new clients
LFL Verified 2026Measured from public recordsYours to display →
49/100LFL Score, every factor measured
16Points from Certified
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
About Motorcycle Safety Lawyers
Motorcycle Safety Lawyers works from West Adams Street and names a single attorney.
381 reviews at 5.0. A free consultation and pages in Spanish, published. It publishes nothing about the rate or the retainer.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
381 client reviews
Counted across 1 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
5 average over 381 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
49out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Illinois does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
LFL Verified 202616 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (53% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: B1 Results published: +6 available · B2 Specificity: +5 available · E1 Free consult & fee transparency: +5 available
G1 LicensureNot published by ILIllinois does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by ILIllinois does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by IL1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. Illinois publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 1 named attorney published.
G6 Footprint381 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2020-01-26, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceIllinois publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceIllinois publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience20/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved381 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 5.0 over 381 reviews → Bayesian 4.96 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-07-17) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority10/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV pass · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm3.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-26DR 25 → 63th pct of 109-firm cohort (median 18) 2/3 · 2,661 referring domains, 96th pct 2/2 · 211 organic keywords / 1,226 visits·mo, 64th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)5 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-26JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness2/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · fee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published1 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Dec 1, 2026 · Cohort: Chicago Personal Injury (110 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
25· 63th percentile
2,661 ref. domains · cohort median 18 · Ahrefs rank 6.6M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-26Trust pages
3 / 3
privacy policy · attorney bios · blog
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Passmobile
Performance 97
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-26Practice areas 2 areas · primary focus highlighted
The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 1 more person is named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
Also named by the firm
The firm lists this person among its team and prints no role beside the name, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
5.0
★★★★★
Based on 381 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 1 location · main office: MSL: Personal Injury Lawyers
MSL: Personal Injury Lawyers105 W Adams St Unit 2800, Chicago, IL 60603, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Motorcycle Safety Lawyers charge?
Motorcycle Safety Lawyers publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Motorcycle Safety Lawyers offer a free consultation?
Yes. Motorcycle Safety Lawyers publishes a free initial consultation. It publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Motorcycle Safety Lawyers have offices?
Motorcycle Safety Lawyers publishes one office, in Chicago. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Motorcycle Safety Lawyers?
Motorcycle Safety Lawyers names one attorney on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Illinois does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Motorcycle Safety Lawyers?
Motorcycle Safety Lawyers scores 47 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.
Yours to display
Show this on your site
Motorcycle Safety Lawyers has earned this badge. They are free, they are not for sale, and each one links back to this page so anybody can read the evidence behind it. They are also live: the file is rebuilt every time we re-measure, so a badge on your site says what is true today rather than what was true the day you copied it.
LFL Verified 2026
On a pale background use the light version.
<a href="https://lawfirmlistings.com/firms/motorcycle-safety-lawyers/">
<img src="https://lawfirmlistings.com/badge/motorcycle-safety-lawyers/tier-2026.svg"
alt="LFL Verified 2026" width="310" height="96">
</a>