1. Home
  2. San Diego, CA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Kroger-Diamond & Campos APC

Kroger-Diamond & Campos APC

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjurySan Diego, CA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.7 · 46 Google reviews2 offices5 attorneysEnglish
LFL Verified 2026Measured from public recordsYours to display →
50/100LFL Score, every factor measured
15Points from Certified
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation

About Kroger-Diamond & Campos APC

Kroger-Diamond & Campos APC works from Avenida Encinas in Carlsbad, with a second office in San Diego, and names five attorneys.

46 reviews at 4.73 across two listings. A free consultation, published. It publishes twelve case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed. It publishes nothing about the rate or the retainer.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 4 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here. The State Bar's record for Carolyn P. Gallinghouse carries an earlier entry, which is not outstanding against the licence today and is published in full at https://apps.calbar.ca.gov/attorney/Licensee/Detail/149650

12 results published

Across 6 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.

25 years average at the bar

Mean 25.2 years since admission across 4 of 5 named attorneys (longest 46, shortest 7) · NYS Attorney Registration database

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

50out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar E (1/15).

LFL Verified 2026
15 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (65% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: D2 Search authority: +6 available · E1 Free consult & fee transparency: +5 available · E4 Availability: +5 available
G1 Licensure4 of 5 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status. 1 name(s) could not be told apart from namesakes and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 4 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here. The State Bar's record for Carolyn P. Gallinghouse carries an earlier entry, which is not outstanding against the licence today and is published in full at https://apps.calbar.ca.gov/attorney/Licensee/Detail/149650
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA2 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 5 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint46 public client reviews across 2 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2019-09-13, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
14/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 25.2 years since admission across 4 of 5 named attorneys (longest 46, shortest 7) · NYS Attorney Registration database10 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry4 of 5 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio4.5 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
8/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted12 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts4.5 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted6 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
15/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved46 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count2 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.73 over 46 reviews → Bayesian 4.80 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only4 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle6 of 10 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-06-12) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 10 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
5/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 2 → 14th pct of 109-firm cohort (median 14) 0/3 · 1,157 referring domains, 62th pct 1/2 · 23 organic keywords / 149 visits·mo, 40th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)2 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle2 operational Google Business Profile listings · 1 photos · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned0.1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
1/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · fee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published1 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Dec 1, 2026 · Cohort: San Diego Personal Injury (113 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
2· 13th percentile
1,157 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 46.8M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30
Trust pages
3 / 3
disclaimer · privacy policy · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 56
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-30

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Kroger-Diamond & Campos APC lists 12 case results on its own website, across 6 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

motor vehicletruckpremiseswrongful deathpedestrianproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their own panel; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

Attorneys 4 attorneys · every licence checked against the California attorney register · 1 more person is named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

MC
Marlon D. CamposAdmitted in NY
CD
Catharine Kroger DiamondAdmitted in NY
CG
Carolyn P. GallinghouseAdmitted in NY
IM
Isaac J. MallettEsq.

Also named by the firm

The firm lists this person among its team and prints no role beside the name, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

4.7
★★★★★
Based on 46 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 2 locations · main office: Carlsbad

Carlsbad7220 Avenida Encinas #203, Carlsbad, CA 92011, USA
San Diego3180 University Ave Ste 640, San Diego, CA 92104, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Kroger-Diamond & Campos APC charge?
Kroger-Diamond & Campos APC publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Kroger-Diamond & Campos APC offer a free consultation?
Yes. Kroger-Diamond & Campos APC publishes a free initial consultation.
Where does Kroger-Diamond & Campos APC have offices?
Kroger-Diamond & Campos APC publishes two offices, in Carlsbad and San Diego. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Kroger-Diamond & Campos APC?
Kroger-Diamond & Campos APC names five attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: California does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Kroger-Diamond & Campos APC publishes verified?
No. Kroger-Diamond & Campos APC publishes twelve case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Kroger-Diamond & Campos APC?
Kroger-Diamond & Campos APC scores 41 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.
Yours to display

Show this on your site

Kroger-Diamond & Campos APC has earned this badge. They are free, they are not for sale, and each one links back to this page so anybody can read the evidence behind it. They are also live: the file is rebuilt every time we re-measure, so a badge on your site says what is true today rather than what was true the day you copied it.

LFL Verified 2026
LFL Verified 2026

On a pale background use the light version.

<a href="https://lawfirmlistings.com/firms/kroger-diamond-campos-apc/">
  <img src="https://lawfirmlistings.com/badge/kroger-diamond-campos-apc/tier-2026.svg"
       alt="LFL Verified 2026" width="310" height="96">
</a>

What the badge means, and the two rules that come with it