1. Home
  2. Los Angeles, CA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Gaylord & Nantais

Gaylord & Nantais

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryLos Angeles, CA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.8 · 57 Google reviews2 offices0 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
LFL Verified 2026Measured from public recordsYours to display →
42/100LFL Score, every factor measured
23Points from Certified
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation

About Gaylord & Nantais

Gaylord & Nantais is a personal injury firm with offices in Long Beach and Los Angeles.

The firm states that it works on a contingency fee, with nothing to pay unless the case is won; the first consultation is free; its intake line is open around the clock. It publishes material in English and Spanish.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

42out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).

LFL Verified 2026
23 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (37% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: B1 Results published: +6 available · B2 Specificity: +5 available · B3 Results disclosure: +4 available
G1 LicensureNo answer in the recordNone of the 2 attorneys this firm names could be found in the State Bar of California's register, so there is nothing here to clear or to fault.
G2 DisciplineNo answer in the recordNo attorney this firm names could be identified in the register, so no disciplinary record could be looked up either.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA2 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 2 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint57 public client reviews across 2 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2005-10-13, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
0/25
A2 Experienceno roster publishedOur crawl found no roster on this firm's site, so there is no admission year to establish for anybody. Publishing one, or telling us where it is, is what gate G5 asks for.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno roster publishedOur crawl found no roster on this firm's site, so there is nothing here to verify against a register. Publishing one, or telling us where it is, is what gate G5 asks for.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
14/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved57 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count2 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.8 over 57 reviews → Bayesian 4.82 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle4 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-07-01) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle1 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them2 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
7/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-10-19DR 7.0 → 36th pct of 141-firm cohort (median 13) 1/3 · 1,172 referring domains, 52th pct 1/2 · 345 organic keywords / 2,596 visits·mo, 86th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)4 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle2 operational Google Business Profile listings · 8 photos · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned0.8 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-10-19JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Dec 1, 2026 · Cohort: Los Angeles Personal Injury (144 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
7· 35th percentile
1,172 ref. domains · cohort median 13.5 · Ahrefs rank 24.6M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-10-19
Trust pages
3 / 3
attorney bios · privacy policy · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 51
Observed · PSI, 2026-10-12

Client reviews

4.8
★★★★★
Based on 57 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 2 locations · main office: Long Beach

Long Beach4001 Atlantic Ave, Long Beach, CA 90807, USA
Los Angeles1644 Wilshire Blvd Ste 200, Los Angeles, CA 90017, USA
Yours to display

Show this on your site

Gaylord & Nantais has earned this badge. They are free, they are not for sale, and each one links back to this page so anybody can read the evidence behind it. They are also live: the file is rebuilt every time we re-measure, so a badge on your site says what is true today rather than what was true the day you copied it.

LFL Verified 2026
LFL Verified 2026

On a pale background use the light version.

<a href="https://lawfirmlistings.com/firms/gaylord-nantais/">
  <img src="https://lawfirmlistings.com/badge/gaylord-nantais/tier-2026.svg"
       alt="LFL Verified 2026" width="310" height="96">
</a>

What the badge means, and the two rules that come with it