DK Law
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjurySan Diego, CA● Accepting new clients
LFL Verified 2026Measured from public recordsYours to display →
52/100LFL Score, every factor measured
13Points from Certified
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
About DK Law
DK Law works from twelve offices across California, among them Rancho Cucamonga, Long Beach and Anaheim, and names 16 attorneys. 30 years by its domain registration, the longest history of any firm listed in San Diego.
3,241 reviews at 4.85 across twelve listings. A free consultation, a 24 hour line and pages in Spanish, published. It publishes nothing about the rate or the retainer.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
3,241 client reviews
Counted across 12 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
4.85 average over 3,241 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
52out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
3 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar B (0/15).
LFL Verified 202613 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (54% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A6 Roster verifiability: +6 available · B1 Results published: +6 available · B2 Specificity: +5 available
G1 Licensure11 of 16 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status. 5 name(s) could not be told apart from namesakes and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNo answer in the recordNo disciplinary record is held against any of the 11 attorneys we identified. Daniel Kim could not be told apart from 8 namesakes, one of whom is not eligible to practise. Held open.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA12 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 16 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint3,241 public client reviews across 12 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 1996-11-14, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing13/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 14.7 years since admission across 11 of 16 named attorneys (longest 36, shortest 2) · NYS Attorney Registration database7 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry11 of 16 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio3 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Board of Trial Advocates, American Bar Association · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience18/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved3,241 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 12 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.85 over 3,241 reviews → Bayesian 4.85 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle45 of 55 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-09) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle2 of 55 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them3 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority10/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 33 → 83th pct of 109-firm cohort (median 14) 2/3 · 2,269 referring domains, 94th pct 2/2 · 460 organic keywords / 3,270 visits·mo, 84th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)6 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle12 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness5/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · fee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published1 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Dec 1, 2026 · Cohort: San Diego Personal Injury (113 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
33· 80th percentile
2,269 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 2.9M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30Trust pages
3 / 3
attorney bios · blog · privacy policy
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 37
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-29Practice areas 6 areas · primary focus highlighted
Attorneys 14 attorneys · 11 of 14 licences checked against the California attorney register · 2 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
NK
Normandy KiddAttorney
LH
Lauren HoffmanAttorney
DK
Daniel KimAttorney
BM
Ben McFaddenAttorney
CD
Craig DunkinAttorney
MT
Matt TaylorAttorney
AB
Anthony BurrolaAttorney
SH
Samar HellarAttorney
CS
Caryn SandersAttorney
ND
Nick D’AgostinoAttorney
IM
Issa MikelAttorney
GK
Greta KatzAttorney
KN
Kara NunezAttorney
JM
Jehrid MosleyAttorney
Also named by the firm
The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
4.8
★★★★★
Based on 3,241 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 12 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 12 locations · main office: Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga9087 Arrow Route #225, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730, USA
Long Beach3646 Long Beach Blvd #201, Long Beach, CA 90807, USA
Anaheim2115 W Crescent Ave #236, Anaheim, CA 92801, USA
Whittier6528 Greenleaf Ave Ste 216, Whittier, CA 90601, USA
Cerritos19112 Gridley Rd Ste 225, Cerritos, CA 90703, USA
San Jose300 S 1st St Ste 311, San Jose, CA 95113, USA
Los Angeles205 S Broadway Ste 402, Los Angeles, CA 90012, USA
Costa Mesa555 Anton Blvd #600, Costa Mesa, CA 92626, USA
Irvine15615 Alton Pkwy #450, Irvine, CA 92618, USA
Riverside7121 Magnolia Ave Ste D, Riverside, CA 92504, USA
Moreno Valley23328 Olive Wood Plaza Dr Ste G, Moreno Valley, CA 92553, USA
San Diego1111 Sixth Ave Suite M04, San Diego, CA 92101, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does DK Law charge?
DK Law publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does DK Law offer a free consultation?
Yes. DK Law publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does DK Law have offices?
DK Law publishes twelve offices, among them Rancho Cucamonga, Long Beach, Anaheim and Whittier. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at DK Law?
DK Law names 16 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: California does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about DK Law?
DK Law scores 51 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.
Yours to display
Show this on your site
DK Law has earned this badge. They are free, they are not for sale, and each one links back to this page so anybody can read the evidence behind it. They are also live: the file is rebuilt every time we re-measure, so a badge on your site says what is true today rather than what was true the day you copied it.
LFL Verified 2026
On a pale background use the light version.
<a href="https://lawfirmlistings.com/firms/dk-law/">
<img src="https://lawfirmlistings.com/badge/dk-law/tier-2026.svg"
alt="LFL Verified 2026" width="310" height="96">
</a>