1. Home
  2. Los Angeles, CA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Cohen & Marzban

Cohen & Marzban

LFL Certified 2026 · Score 66Personal InjuryLos Angeles, CA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 5.0 · 321 Google reviews2 offices2 attorneysEnglish
LFL Certified 2026Measured from public recordsYours to display →
66/100LFL Score, every factor measured
12Points from Distinguished
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation

About Cohen & Marzban

Cohen & Marzban is a personal injury firm with two offices across California.

The firm states that it works on a contingency fee, with nothing to pay unless the case is won; the first consultation is free; its intake line is open around the clock.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Certified 2026

Scored 66 out of 100 on measured evidence, above the 70 this tier requires, with every eligibility gate its state allows us to check cleared.

No public discipline

No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 2 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here

321 client reviews

Counted across 2 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.98 average over 321 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

38 years average at the bar

Mean 38.0 years since admission across 2 of 2 named attorneys (longest 55, shortest 21) · NYS Attorney Registration database

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

66out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

LFL Certified

4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar B (6/15).

LFL Certified 2026 · re-verified Oct 28, 2026
12 points to Distinguished
78 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (74% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: B3 Results disclosure: +4 available · E3 Languages & accessibility: +4.0 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +3 available
G1 Licensure2 of 3 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status. 1 name(s) could not be told apart from namesakes and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 2 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA2 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 3 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint321 public client reviews across 2 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2016-04-11, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
16/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 38.0 years since admission across 2 of 2 named attorneys (longest 55, shortest 21) · NYS Attorney Registration database10 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry2 of 2 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio6 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
6/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted9 results published on the firm's own site, counted from result headings3 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted5 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
20/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved321 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.98 over 321 reviews → Bayesian 4.94 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle9 of 10 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-28) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 10 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
10/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-10-19DR 35.0 → 87th pct of 141-firm cohort (median 13) 3/3 · 1,774 referring domains, 89th pct 2/2 · 615 organic keywords / 5,987 visits·mo, 94th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)7 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle2 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-10-19no JSON-LD detected 0/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)0 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
6/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Dec 1, 2026 · Cohort: Los Angeles Personal Injury (144 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
35· 85th percentile
1,774 ref. domains · cohort median 13.5 · Ahrefs rank 2.5M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-10-19
Trust pages
3 / 3
disclaimer · privacy policy · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 60
Observed · PSI, 2026-10-12

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Cohen & Marzban lists 9 case results on its own website, across 5 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

motor vehiclepremiseswrongful deathproduct liabilityassault
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their own panel; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

Attorneys 2 attorneys · every licence checked against the California attorney register

BC
Bob M. CohenAttorney
MM
Michael M. MarzbanAttorney

Client reviews

5.0
★★★★★
Based on 321 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 2 locations · main office: Los Angeles

Los Angeles12121 Wilshire Blvd Ste 103, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA
Los Angeles714 W Olympic Blvd Ste 631, Los Angeles, CA 90015, USA
Yours to display

Show this on your site

Cohen & Marzban has earned these 4 badges. They are free, they are not for sale, and each one links back to this page so anybody can read the evidence behind it. They are also live: the file is rebuilt every time we re-measure, so a badge on your site says what is true today rather than what was true the day you copied it.

LFL Certified 2026
LFL Certified 2026

On a pale background use the light version.

<a href="https://lawfirmlistings.com/firms/cohen-marzban/">
  <img src="https://lawfirmlistings.com/badge/cohen-marzban/tier-2026.svg"
       alt="LFL Certified 2026" width="310" height="96">
</a>
Ranked 7th of 35 for Medical Malpractice in Los Angeles, 2026
Ranked 7th of 35 · Medical Malpractice · Los Angeles

On a pale background use the light version.

<a href="https://lawfirmlistings.com/firms/cohen-marzban/">
  <img src="https://lawfirmlistings.com/badge/cohen-marzban/medical-malpractice-2026.svg"
       alt="Ranked 7th of 35 for Medical Malpractice in Los Angeles, 2026" width="310" height="96">
</a>
Ranked 5th of 29 for Nursing Home Abuse in Los Angeles, 2026
Ranked 5th of 29 · Nursing Home Abuse · Los Angeles

On a pale background use the light version.

<a href="https://lawfirmlistings.com/firms/cohen-marzban/">
  <img src="https://lawfirmlistings.com/badge/cohen-marzban/nursing-home-abuse-2026.svg"
       alt="Ranked 5th of 29 for Nursing Home Abuse in Los Angeles, 2026" width="310" height="96">
</a>
Ranked 9th of 40 for Workers' Compensation in Los Angeles, 2026
Ranked 9th of 40 · Workers' Compensation · Los Angeles

On a pale background use the light version.

<a href="https://lawfirmlistings.com/firms/cohen-marzban/">
  <img src="https://lawfirmlistings.com/badge/cohen-marzban/workers-compensation-2026.svg"
       alt="Ranked 9th of 40 for Workers' Compensation in Los Angeles, 2026" width="310" height="96">
</a>

What the badge means, and the two rules that come with it