1. Home
  2. Los Angeles, CA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Blair & Ramirez LLP

Blair & Ramirez LLP

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryLos Angeles, CA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.8 · 88 Google reviews1 office5 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
LFL Verified 2026Measured from public recordsYours to display →
54/100LFL Score, every factor measured
11Points from Certified
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation

About Blair & Ramirez

Blair & Ramirez LLP is a personal injury firm with a single office in Los Angeles.

The firm states that it works on a contingency fee, with nothing to pay unless the case is won; the first consultation is free; its intake line is open around the clock. It publishes material in English and Spanish.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 5 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

54out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar B (0/15).

LFL Verified 2026
11 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (53% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: B1 Results published: +6 available · B2 Specificity: +5 available · B3 Results disclosure: +4 available
G1 Licensure5 of 5 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 5 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 5 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint88 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2017-01-03, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
13/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 14.4 years since admission across 5 of 5 named attorneys (longest 21, shortest 7) · NYS Attorney Registration database7 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry5 of 5 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio6 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
17/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved88 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.8 over 88 reviews → Bayesian 4.81 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle4 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-05-01) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
10/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-10-19DR 30.0 → 80th pct of 141-firm cohort (median 13) 2/3 · 1,951 referring domains, 91th pct 2/2 · 164 organic keywords / 1,915 visits·mo, 78th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)6 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-10-19JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Dec 1, 2026 · Cohort: Los Angeles Personal Injury (144 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
30· 79th percentile
1,951 ref. domains · cohort median 13.5 · Ahrefs rank 4.2M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-10-19
Trust pages
3 / 3
blog · disclaimer · privacy policy
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 56
Observed · PSI, 2026-10-12

Attorneys 5 attorneys · every licence checked against the California attorney register

MB
Matthew P. BlairAdmitted in CA
OR
Oscar RamirezAdmitted in CA
KL
Kirill LavinskiAdmitted in CA
RJ
Regina JurczakAdmitted in CA
KS
Kitty SzetoAdmitted in CA

Client reviews

4.8
★★★★★
Based on 88 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 1 location · main office: Los Angeles

Los Angeles555 W 5th St Ste 3750, Los Angeles, CA 90013, USA
Yours to display

Show this on your site

Blair & Ramirez LLP has earned this badge. They are free, they are not for sale, and each one links back to this page so anybody can read the evidence behind it. They are also live: the file is rebuilt every time we re-measure, so a badge on your site says what is true today rather than what was true the day you copied it.

LFL Verified 2026
LFL Verified 2026

On a pale background use the light version.

<a href="https://lawfirmlistings.com/firms/blair-ramirez-llp/">
  <img src="https://lawfirmlistings.com/badge/blair-ramirez-llp/tier-2026.svg"
       alt="LFL Verified 2026" width="310" height="96">
</a>

What the badge means, and the two rules that come with it